[php-maint] Packaging php-pear from PEAR

[Jan Wagner]

On Monday 01 October 2007 10:06, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 08:45:55AM +0200, Jan Wagner wrote:
> > On Sunday 30 September 2007 09:26, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > I don't think it's a good idea to have decisions about pear being made
> > > autonomously from the php packages.
> >
> > could you please raise objections (beside a separate source package in
> > pool)?
>
> Huh?

The question, which comes to my mind ... what are the disadvantages of 
separating pear and php packages? (There is no valuation in the question)

With kind regards, Jan.
-- 
Never write mail to <waja at spamfalle.info>, you have been warned!
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GIT d-- s+: a- C+++ UL++++ P+ L+++ E- W+++ N+++ o++ K++ w--- O M V- PS PE
Y++ PGP++ t-- 5 X R tv- b+ DI- D++ G++ e++ h-- r+++ y+++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-php-maint/attachments/20071001/1ea15d7b/attachment.pgp