[php-maint] Proper source package name for the PECL HTTP module?
thomas at goirand.fr
Sat Jan 22 09:16:43 UTC 2011
On 01/22/2011 07:52 AM, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> So... should I rename the bug (and my package) to php-pecl-http, or is
> there some other convention already for PHP packages with duplicate
> names in the various PHP package namespaces (PEAR, PECL, etc)?
> Thanks for taking the time to read this, and keep up the good work!
IMHO, php-pecl-http is fine. As much as I know, there's no convention
for name duplicates. Also, I would advise that the binary package be the
same as the source one if possible (or maybe php5-pecl-http if it's
dependent on the PHP version), so it easy to spot.
More information about the pkg-php-maint