[php-maint] Bug#664595: RFH: php5
Ondřej Surý
ondrej at sury.org
Mon Mar 30 11:39:42 UTC 2015
Hi David,
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015, at 00:11, David Prévot wrote:
> Hi PHP Maintainers, PHP PEAR Maintainers,
>
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 09:14:21AM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: normal
>
> > Using PHP? Loving PHP? Feeling like having too much free time?
> >
> > I WANT YOU FOR PHP MAINTAINER TEAM
> > <contact your nearest recruiting station>
> > <or the pkg-php-maint mailing list>
> >
> > We constantly need help with:
>
> I seem to recall (but couldn’t find any reference last time I checked)
> that you were willing to pull away php-pear from the php5 source
> package, and were looking for someone to take it over.
I seem to recall it as well.
> If I didn’t dreamt it, and if you believe it would be welcome, I would
> be willing to look into it on behalf of the PHP PEAR Maintainers (and
> would be more than happy to share it with other people).
I think that the idea I had was that the base PEAR Packages we
distribute are updated less frequently and I have no idea whether this
is good or not:
PHP 5.6.6
# pear list-upgrades
pear.php.net Available Upgrades (stable):
=========================================
Channel Package Local Remote Size
pear.php.net Archive_Tar 1.3.12 (stable) 1.3.15 (stable) 19.6kB
pear.php.net Console_Getopt 1.3.1 (stable) 1.4.0 (stable) 4.5kB
pear.php.net Structures_Graph 1.0.4 (stable) 1.1.0 (stable) 12.2kB
pear.php.net XML_Util 1.2.3 (stable) 1.3.0 (stable) 16.8kB
So if this was a separate meta package the individual PEAR packages
could be updated individually (and also versioned accordingly).
> Feel free to follow up with some pointers if you’d like us to prepare
> something, maybe via an other RFP/ITP bug report, or directly on (at
> least) the PHP PEAR Maintainers list.
I suggest something like this:
1. You prepare PEAR, Archive_Tar, Console_Getopt, Structures_Graph and
XML_Util as individual packages in experimental
2. After jessie is out, I will change the build process to make php-pear
just a dummy package that depends on those packages. And perhaps it
could Recommend few more packages according to your recommendations.
3. (optional) I will parse the phar archive distributed with PHP and
each php-pear package will depend on >= ${version-in-phar}
How does that sound?
Cheers,
--
Ondřej Surý <ondrej at sury.org>
Knot DNS (https://www.knot-dns.cz/) – a high-performance DNS server
More information about the pkg-php-maint
mailing list