[Pkg-postgresql-private] PostgreSQL 7.4 has been released

Oliver Elphick olly@lfix.co.uk
Tue, 18 Nov 2003 16:39:17 +0000


On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 21:35, Martin Pitt wrote:
> On 2003-11-17 21:22 +0000, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> > I am making progress with programming the new wrapper structure for
> > multiple releases, and judging by the current rate of progress, I expect
> > to be able to get it into sarge.
> 
> Is there anything we can help you with? There are not many
> important/normal bugs left that don't have sth. to do with upgrading.

I'm concentrating on the pg_wrapper C programming whenever I get the
chance.  Once I've done that, I will need to get the three versions of
PostgreSQL packages (7.2.1, 7.3.4 and 7.4) converted to use the
versioned paths and the necessary changes will need to be made to
upstream programs as described in the spec (which I have just upgraded
from a proposal to a description).

Are there any parts of those operations that you would like to take on? 
(I will upload the packages to cvs today).

I also need people to take a very close look at the specification and
think of everything that can go wrong, and everything that is just not
going to work.

> In fact there are only four important bugs left:
> 
> #167864 (the language installation thingy)

I suppose we should be more intelligent about that, and not try to do
anything if we cannot connect to template1.

> #201165 (ominous postinst failure; maybe this has already gone, I don't know)

This is a preinst failure, but I believe it may be fixed.

> #217953 (init.d script ignores user limits)

Should this be transferred to dpkg as a problem with start-stop-daemon?
I can't see what we can do about it.

> #220766 (dangling symlink pg_config)

I just fixed that one.

> I already tried to cope with #201165, but couldn't reproduce it. The
> first seems pretty complicated, but I could take a look at it. But all
> four should probably be fixed with the next unstable release, if you
> look at the time it needs to get to sarge... Any volunteers? :-)
> 
> Oliver, what to do with these three NMU bugs? Can they be just ack'ed
> in the changelog?

They should all be tagged woody as well.  They have been fixed already
and we will close them when sarge is released.

-- 
Oliver Elphick                                Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk
Isle of Wight, UK                             http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839  932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
                 ========================================
     "A Song for the sabbath day. It is a good thing to 
      give thanks unto the LORD, and to sing praises unto 
      thy name, O most High."   Psalms 92:1