[Pkg-postgresql-public] Postgresql & libpq 9.2 in backports?

[Whitmer, Ray David]

Is there some archived discussion that I can read to understand why 9.2 is not a candidate for either of these? I read the documents I found on the backports site, etc.  which got my hopes up, but obviously those are quite generic.

Thanks,

Ray 

-----Original Message-----
From: Christoph Berg [mailto:cb at df7cb.de] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 3:09 AM
To: Whitmer, Ray David
Cc: pkg-postgresql-public at lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: Re: [Pkg-postgresql-public] Postgresql & libpq 9.2 in backports?

Re: Whitmer, Ray David 2013-03-25 <80AD5451CC41E7469361BF6B1FC38D3414856D42EC at MX33A.corp.emc.com>
> What needs to be resolved to put PostgresQL / libpq(dev) 9.2 into squeeze backports? I have not contributed previously, but I could do whatever work I am able to advance that goal, but those on this list who do the main packages probably know already what may be required or be blocking this.

squeeze-backports will only receive packages that will be part of wheezy, the next Debian version, that is 9.1. If you need other PostgreSQL versions, use the repository there:

https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Apt

Christoph
--
cb at df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/