[Pkg-protobuf-devel] Bug#835170: transition: protobuf

[Dmitry Smirnov]

On Tuesday, 23 August 2016 11:32:10 AM AEST Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> > Dmitry, have you tested the reverse dependencies if they still build?

No... We will have to deal with fallout, if any... It is crucial to have 
protobuf-3 from life cycle prospective. Also several golang dependencies 
require protobuf v3 so upload actually allows to fix numerous problems.

Apologies for inconvenience...


> First the many build failures need to be resolved:
> 
>   https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=protobuf

I've noticed that but I'm unable to reproduce neither on amd64 not on i386.
Even now when GCC 6.2 propagated to my local mirror... I'm completely puzzled 
by those build failures after spending hours trying to reproduce the 
problem...


> protobuf (3.0.0-1) FTBFS pretty much everywhere. :-(
> 
> Using -Werror may be a bit much based on the buildlogs.

I think it may not be the problem in this particular case...

Thank you.

-- 
Regards,
 Dmitry Smirnov.

---

Faith: not wanting to know what the truth is.
        -- Friedrich Nietzsche
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-protobuf-devel/attachments/20160824/6ed8aa77/attachment.sig>