on the "[PATCH]" workflow before committing

[Stefano Zacchiroli]

On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 11:35:47AM +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> I've been playing a bit with gnupg and the attached patch should add preliminary
> support for checking pgp signature for dsc and changes files, note that the

I remember that Dato requested the workflow which Filippo implemented in
his last 2/3 posts to this mailing list, namely: before pushing anything
to the bazaar repo posting a [PATCH] message here waiting for comments.

I'm totally fine with that, but given that comments are not apparently
arriving (yet?) I fear we will loose patches in mailing list archives.
So, at least, I suggest to change the workflow to wishlist+patch
bugreports against python-debian. At least we will have a way to keep
track of proposed new features.

Filippo: can you please convert your two latest patch propositions to
bugreports?

Cheers.

PS I'm traveling these days, but starting tomorrow I'll work again a bit
   more on python-debian, I hope to come back to Filippo patches as well

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
I'm still an SGML person,this newfangled /\ All one has to do is hit the
XML stuff is so ... simplistic  -- Manoj \/ right keys at the right time
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-python-debian-discuss/attachments/20080608/16513bc3/attachment.pgp