[Pkg-running-devel] antpm_1.13-1_i386.changes REJECTED

[Christian PERRIER]

Quoting Kristof Ralovich (ralovich at in.tum.de):

> > w_stdint.h and w_inttypes.h appear to be BSD-3, please document
> > this in your copyright file.
> >
> > It also looks like a hunk of code (such as src\SerialUsb.cpp) is
> > under the GPLv2, hard, even though GPL-3 is on the top level of
> > the package.
> >
> > Confusing! Might want to let upstream know about some of this
> > stuff.
> >
> > Anyway, looks fine other than that. Just drop GPL2 and BSD-3 in the
> > copyright file and re-upload - let me know when it's back in NEW
> > so that I can process it.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >   Paul
> >
> > ===
> >
> > Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> > your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
> > concerns.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pkg-running-devel mailing list
> > Pkg-running-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-running-devel
> >
> 
> 
> Dear Christian,
> 
> I've tried to address Paul's comment. The patch is pushed. Maybe we could
> try to do a 1.13-2. What do you think?

I have a doubt about the mention "antpm portions © 2011-2013 RALOVICH,
Kristóf <tade60 at freemail.hu> released under GPLv2". It doesn't make it
really clear of what is GPLv2 and what is GPLv3.

Is there a strong reason for not realeasing everything (but the two
files that are BSD and the one that is GPLv2, SerialUsb.cpp), under
GPLv3.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-running-devel/attachments/20140106/87736682/attachment.sig>