[Pkg-running-devel] antpm not built on amd64
Philipp Kern
pkern at debian.org
Mon Mar 31 14:04:58 UTC 2014
Hi kristof,
On 2014-03-27 10:04, kristof.ralovich at gmail.com wrote:
> according to https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=antpm [1]
> our package antpm was not built or the amd64 architecture: "No entry
> in amd64 database, check Packages-arch-specific".
> - Could you please explain to me what this means?
> - Why is it not build for amd64?
> - How may we fix it?
this is not a P-a-s problem. The problem is this:
merge-v3 2014 Mar 31 13:21:57 antpm_1.16-1 (sparc, sid): skipped because
binaries (assumed to be) overwritten (garmin-ant-downloader, 1.16-1 vs.
0:20110626-1)
pkern at franck ~ % dak ls garmin-ant-downloader
W: Archive maintenance is in progress; database inconsistencies are
possible.
garmin-ant-downloader | 1.16-1 | unstable | all
garmin-ant-downloader | 0:20110626-1 | stable | source, amd64,
armel, armhf, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, sparc
garmin-ant-downloader | 0:20110626-1 | testing | source, amd64,
armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390x, sparc
garmin-ant-downloader | 0:20110626-1 | unstable | source, amd64,
armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390x, sparc
You build garmin-ant-downloader from antpm now, as an arch:all package
with a version number lower than what's currently as arch:any in the
archive. The binary package in question needs to have a version that's
higher than 0:20110626-1, so it possibly needs to be epoch'ed. Then the
old source package and binary builds need to be removed from unstable
(using a bug report against ftp.debian.org).
After that's done wb should pick it up. The other non-linux
architectures picked it up because garmin-ant-downloader was not
previously built for them.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
More information about the Pkg-running-devel
mailing list