[Pkg-scicomp-devel] fw: gfortran transition release goal proposal
Kevin B. McCarty
kmccarty at Princeton.EDU
Fri Jul 27 15:49:45 UTC 2007
George N. White III wrote:
> This transition should not be a tied to gfortran and the gcc toolchain. When
> the code has to change, it should be made to conform to current standards,
> or in a few years we will doing it all over yet again. One approach would be
> to adopt the POSX Fortran bindings, the other is to use the current Fortran
> standard. The former has pxf_getarg(), while the latter provides:
>
> call GET_COMMAND_ARGUMENT(iarg, buf, ilen, ierror)
>
> There was an open source implementation of the POSIX fortran bindings
> by Ron Shepard at ANL, and at least one independent implementation has
> been mentioned on c.l.f.
>
What do you suggest for *C/C++* code that, for whatever reason, needs to
call GETARG() or whatever the modern equivalent is from a FORTRAN library?
best regards,
--
Kevin B. McCarty <kmccarty at princeton.edu> Physics Department
WWW: http://www.princeton.edu/~kmccarty/ Princeton University
GPG: public key ID 4F83C751 Princeton, NJ 08544
More information about the Pkg-scicomp-devel
mailing list