[Pkg-scicomp-devel] Bug#463942: abinit -- please use gfortran based blas, lapack

[Kumar Appaiah]

Dear Ondrej,

On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 11:44:28AM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> > This is a tested patch which does the needful, which you may use to
> > base your change:
> 
> Thanks very much for your patch. I'll try to incorporate it later today.

No problems! :-)

> Just curious - is there some list, how many packages still need to be
> fixed in Debian?

I am now filing bugs against packages which use the old refblas-dev
and/or lapack3-dev as Build-Dependencies. A current list is (sort of):

#: bug filed.
*: Maintainer handling/handled issue
(nothing): I will file a bug, with or without a patch.

# suitesparse-metis
# abinit
# arpack
# arpack++
# blitz++
* cernlib
# cvxopt
# dsdp
# ghemical
# gimp-plugin-registry
# gretl
# harminv
# libghemical
* libitpp
lush
meep
mpb
mpqc
octave2.1
octave2.9
octave3.0
openmx
petsc
plplot
psicode
pysparse
python-numarray
python-numeric
python-numpy
python-scipy
scalapack
shogun
suitesparse
cgal

Hope this helps.

Kumar
-- 
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-scicomp-devel/attachments/20080204/17443c74/attachment-0001.pgp