[Pkg-scicomp-devel] lapack_3.2.0-1_i386.changes REJECTED

[Sylvestre Ledru]

Le mercredi 07 janvier 2009 à 14:55 +0100, Rafael Laboissiere a écrit :
> * Rafael Laboissiere <rafael at debian.org> [2009-01-07 13:30]:
> 
> > * Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre.ledru at inria.fr> [2009-01-07 13:07]:
> > 
> > > Le mercredi 07 janvier 2009 à 13:10 +0100, Rafael Laboissiere a écrit :
> > > > * Debian Installer <installer at ftp-master.debian.org> [2009-01-07 10:47]:
> > > > 
> > > > > Rejected: lapack_3.2.0-1.dsc: syntax error on line 27.
> > > > > Rejected: lapack_3.2.0-1.dsc: no Files: field.
> > > > > Rejected: sylvestre.ledru at inria.fr is not in Maintainer or Uploaders of source package lapack
> > > > 
> > > > This is strange, since Sylvestre has already successfully uploaded previous
> > > > versions of lapack to unstable.  Is it caused by the obsolete
> > > > XS-DM-Upload-Allowed field (and just changed it to DM-Upload-Allowed in
> > > > SVN).
> > > Indeed, thanks for changing that (however, I didn't now that you were
> > > working on it and I tried to upload again: failure again).
> > 
> > No problem.  I will upload it with the right field.
> 
> Lintian is giving the two following errors:
> 
> E: liblapack-doc: doc-base-file-references-missing-file liblapack-doc.lug:8 /usr/share/doc/liblapack-doc/lug/index.html
> E: liblapack-doc: doc-base-file-references-missing-file liblapack-doc.lug:9 /usr/share/doc/liblapack-doc/lug/*.html
> 
> It seems that the doc rule in debian/rules must be exercised, but it doesn't.
Seems they forgot the html pages in the tarball. I am in touch with them
about that issue.
Thanks for pointing this out. I missed it.

Sylvestre