[Pkg-scicomp-devel] ufc_1.1.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
johannr at simula.no
Mon May 25 10:18:14 UTC 2009
I am close to fix the missing licenses/copyright issues with UFC but I am
wondering how to deal with the file doc/manual/eps/insertion.eps from the
upstream source . The file is generated by ESP Ghostscript as stated in
%%Creator: ESP Ghostscript 81504 (epswrite)
Only part of the file is copyrighted by artofcode LLC:
% This copyright applies to everything between here and the %%EndProlog:
% Copyright (C) 2004 artofcode LLC, Benicia, CA. All rights reserved.
No license is specified, however, ESP Ghostscript is AFAIK licensed under
GNU GPL v2 (see ). Is this the right license to specify for
insertion.eps? Can I add something like this to debian/copyright:
Copyright: (C) 2004 artofcode LLC, Benicia, CA
Any comments? Please tell me if I should direct this question somewhere else.
On Sun, May 17, 2009 19:38, Mike O'Connor wrote:
> Hi maintainer,
> REJECT: missing licenses / copyright holders.
> You claim that the source is all in the public domain, however I several
> missing licenses and copyright holders. Including these:
> File: Poisson.form
> # Copyright (C) 2004-2007 Anders Logg (logg at simula.no)
> # Licensed under the GNU GPL Version 2
> File: insertion.eps
> % This copyright applies to everything between here and the %%EndProlog:
> % Copyright (C) 2004 artofcode LLC, Benicia, CA. All rights reserved.
> File: algorithm.sty% Copyright -- 1994 Peter Williams
> % This style file is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> % modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
> % License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
> % version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
> File: makedist
> Copyright (C) Anders Logg 2004-2009
> Licensed under the GNU GPL version 3 or any later version
> File: build.py
> __author__ = "Johan Hake (hake at simula.no)"
> __copyright__ = "Copyright (C) 2009 Johan Hake"
> __license__ = "GNU LGPL Version 2.1"
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
More information about the Pkg-scicomp-devel