there are still some licensing issues that I haven't had time to look at/fix<br>The package is ready otherwise.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Jan 29, 2008 8:40 AM, Drew Parsons <<a href="mailto:dparsons@debian.org">dparsons@debian.org</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Hi Christophe,<br><br>I notice the changelog for freefem++ (I got a deb from<br><a href="http://people.debian.org/%7Eprudhomm/debian/" target="_blank">http://people.debian.org/~prudhomm/debian/</a>) says licence problems are<br>
now fixed, though it's still not in the Debian archive.<br><br>Does that mean freefem++ is now ready to let into the archive or do any<br>other problems remain?<br><br>I'm keen to use it, and I've had some trouble with freefem which I<br>
imagine might have been fixed in freefem++.<br><br>Thanks,<br><font color="#888888">Drew<br><br></font></blockquote></div><br>