[Pkg-shadow-commits] r1492 - in upstream/trunk: . src
nekral-guest at alioth.debian.org
nekral-guest at alioth.debian.org
Wed Dec 26 13:18:27 UTC 2007
Author: nekral-guest
Date: 2007-12-26 13:18:27 +0000 (Wed, 26 Dec 2007)
New Revision: 1492
Modified:
upstream/trunk/ChangeLog
upstream/trunk/src/useradd.c
Log:
Mention RedHat's patches for previous commits.
Merge RedHat's patch shadow-4.0.18.1-findNewUidOnce.patch:
* src/useradd.c (usr_update): Do not call find_new_uid(). The UID was
already either specified or found by another call to find_new_uid().
* src/useradd.c (find_new_uid): Always start with uid_min (find_new_uid()
is never called when user_id was already specified).
* src/useradd.c (find_new_uid): Fix the comments (find_new_uid() is not
called when the UID is specified (uflg)).
* src/useradd.c (main): Only call find_new_uid() if (!oflg) and (!uflg).
If uflg is set (but not oflg), check the UID uniqueness.
* src/useradd.c (find_new_uid): Don't check the uid and user name
uniqueness in find_new_uid(). The user name uniqueness is already checked
during the parameter validation. UID uniqueness is also checked (see
above).
* src/useradd.c (find_new_uid): Don't check uflg in find_new_uid().
* src/useradd.c (find_new_uid): Make sure that find_new_uid() is not
called when uflg is set (assert).
Cleanups in find_new_gid:
* src/useradd.c (find_new_gid): Check that gflg is not set (assert).
* src/useradd.c (find_new_gid): Do not check the group name uniqueness
(already checked in main).
* src/useradd.c (find_new_gid): Avoid a "continue" in the loop.
* src/useradd.c (find_new_gid): Remove irrelevant comments.
* src/useradd.c (find_new_gid): Fix the function definition's comment.
Modified: upstream/trunk/ChangeLog
===================================================================
--- upstream/trunk/ChangeLog 2007-12-26 10:15:20 UTC (rev 1491)
+++ upstream/trunk/ChangeLog 2007-12-26 13:18:27 UTC (rev 1492)
@@ -1,5 +1,35 @@
2007-12-26 Nicolas François <nicolas.francois at centraliens.net>
+ Cleanups:
+ * src/useradd.c (find_new_gid): Check that gflg is not set (assert).
+ * src/useradd.c (find_new_gid): Do not check the group name uniqueness
+ (already checked in main).
+ * src/useradd.c (find_new_gid): Avoid a "continue" in the loop.
+ * src/useradd.c (find_new_gid): Remove irrelevant comments.
+ * src/useradd.c (find_new_gid): Fix the function definition's comment.
+
+2007-12-26 Nicolas François <nicolas.francois at centraliens.net>
+
+ Merge RedHat's patch shadow-4.0.18.1-findNewUidOnce.patch:
+ * src/useradd.c (usr_update): Do not call find_new_uid(). The UID was
+ already either specified or found by another call to find_new_uid().
+ * src/useradd.c (find_new_uid): Always start with uid_min (find_new_uid()
+ is never called when user_id was already specified).
+ * src/useradd.c (find_new_uid): Fix the comments (find_new_uid() is not
+ called when the UID is specified (uflg)).
+ * src/useradd.c (main): Only call find_new_uid() if (!oflg) and (!uflg).
+ If uflg is set (but not oflg), check the UID uniqueness.
+ * src/useradd.c (find_new_uid): Don't check the uid and user name
+ uniqueness in find_new_uid(). The user name uniqueness is already checked
+ during the parameter validation. UID uniqueness is also checked (see
+ above).
+ * src/useradd.c (find_new_uid): Don't check uflg in find_new_uid().
+ * src/useradd.c (find_new_uid): Make sure that find_new_uid() is not
+ called when uflg is set (assert).
+
+2007-12-26 Nicolas François <nicolas.francois at centraliens.net>
+
+ Merge RedHat's patch shadow-4.1.0-lOption.patch
* NEWS, src/useradd.c, man/useradd.8.xml: Add option -l to avoid adding
the user to the lastlog and faillog databases.
@@ -15,6 +45,7 @@
2007-12-26 Nicolas François <nicolas.francois at centraliens.net>
+ Merge RedHat's patch shadow-4.0.3-noinst.patch
* NEWS, lib/Makefile.am: Do not install the shadow library per default.
lib_LTLIBRARIES changed to noinst_LTLIBRARIES.
Modified: upstream/trunk/src/useradd.c
===================================================================
--- upstream/trunk/src/useradd.c 2007-12-26 10:15:20 UTC (rev 1491)
+++ upstream/trunk/src/useradd.c 2007-12-26 13:18:27 UTC (rev 1492)
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
#ident "$Id$"
+#include <assert.h>
#include <ctype.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
@@ -816,52 +817,31 @@
* find_new_uid - find the next available UID
*
* find_new_uid() locates the next highest unused UID in the password
- * file, or checks the given user ID against the existing ones for
- * uniqueness.
+ * file.
*/
static void find_new_uid (void)
{
const struct passwd *pwd;
uid_t uid_min, uid_max;
+ /*
+ * It doesn't make sense to use find_new_uid(),
+ * if an UID is specified via "-u" option.
+ */
+ assert (!uflg);
+
uid_min = getdef_unum ("UID_MIN", 1000);
uid_max = getdef_unum ("UID_MAX", 60000);
- /*
- * Start with some UID value if the user didn't provide us with
- * one already.
- */
- if (!uflg)
- user_id = uid_min;
+ user_id = uid_min;
/*
- * Search the entire password file, either looking for this
- * UID (if the user specified one with -u) or looking for the
- * largest unused value.
+ * Search the entire password file,
+ * looking for the largest unused value.
*/
setpwent ();
- while ((pwd = getpwent ())) {
- if (strcmp (user_name, pwd->pw_name) == 0) {
- fprintf (stderr, _("%s: name %s is not unique\n"),
- Prog, user_name);
-#ifdef WITH_AUDIT
- audit_logger (AUDIT_USER_CHAUTHTOK, Prog, "adding user",
- user_name, user_id, 0);
-#endif
- exit (E_NAME_IN_USE);
- }
- if (uflg && user_id == pwd->pw_uid) {
- fprintf (stderr, _("%s: UID %u is not unique\n"),
- Prog, (unsigned int) user_id);
-#ifdef WITH_AUDIT
- audit_logger (AUDIT_USER_CHAUTHTOK, Prog, "adding user",
- user_name, user_id, 0);
-#endif
- exit (E_UID_IN_USE);
- }
- if (!uflg && pwd->pw_uid >= user_id) {
- if (pwd->pw_uid > uid_max)
- continue;
+ while ((pwd = getpwent ()) != NULL) {
+ if ((pwd->pw_uid >= user_id) && (pwd->pw_uid <= uid_max)) {
user_id = pwd->pw_uid + 1;
}
}
@@ -872,39 +852,39 @@
* free UID starting with UID_MIN (it's O(n*n) but can be avoided
* by not having users with UID equal to UID_MAX). --marekm
*/
- if (!uflg && user_id == uid_max + 1) {
+ if (user_id == uid_max + 1) {
for (user_id = uid_min; user_id < uid_max; user_id++) {
/* local, no need for xgetpwuid */
if (!getpwuid (user_id))
break;
}
if (user_id == uid_max) {
- fprintf (stderr, _("%s: can't get unique UID\n"), Prog);
+ fprintf (stderr, _("%s: can't get unique UID (run out of UIDs)\n"), Prog);
fail_exit (E_UID_IN_USE);
}
}
}
- /*
- * find_new_gid - find the next available GID
- *
- * find_new_gid() locates the next highest unused GID in the group
- * file, or checks the given group ID against the existing ones for
- * uniqueness.
- */
-
+/*
+ * find_new_gid - find the next available GID
+ *
+ * find_new_gid() locates the next highest unused GID in the group
+ * file
+ */
static void find_new_gid ()
{
const struct group *grp;
gid_t gid_min, gid_max;
+ /*
+ * It doesn't make sense to use find_new_gid(),
+ * if a group is specified via "-g" option.
+ */
+ assert (!gflg);
+
gid_min = getdef_num ("GID_MIN", 500);
gid_max = getdef_num ("GID_MAX", 60000);
- /*
- * Start with some GID value if the user didn't provide us with
- * one already.
- */
user_gid = gid_min;
/*
@@ -914,13 +894,7 @@
*/
setgrent ();
while ((grp = getgrent ())) {
- if (strcmp (user_name, grp->gr_name) == 0) {
- user_gid = grp->gr_gid;
- return;
- }
- if (grp->gr_gid >= user_gid) {
- if (grp->gr_gid > gid_max)
- continue;
+ if ((grp->gr_gid >= user_gid) && (grp->gr_gid <= gid_max)) {
user_gid = grp->gr_gid + 1;
}
}
@@ -1448,9 +1422,6 @@
struct passwd pwent;
struct spwd spent;
- if (!oflg)
- find_new_uid ();
-
/*
* Fill in the password structure with any new fields, making
* copies of strings.
@@ -1729,7 +1700,17 @@
/* first, seek for a valid uid to use for this user.
* We do this because later we can use the uid we found as
* gid too ... --gafton */
- find_new_uid ();
+ if (!uflg)
+ find_new_uid ();
+ else {
+ if (getpwuid (user_id) != NULL) {
+ fprintf (stderr, _("%s: UID %u is not unique\n"), Prog, (unsigned int) user_id);
+#ifdef WITH_AUDIT
+ audit_logger (AUDIT_USER_CHAUTHTOK, Prog, "adding user", user_name, user_id, 0);
+#endif
+ exit (E_UID_IN_USE);
+ }
+ }
}
/* do we have to add a group for that user? This is why we need to
More information about the Pkg-shadow-commits
mailing list