[Pkg-silc-devel] Please binNMU pidgin against libsilc-dev (>= 1.1.9-1)

[Cyril Brulebois]

Luk Claes <luk at debian.org> (11/07/2009):
> Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> > Hi mighty members of the release team,
> > 
> > Could you please schedule a binNMU of pidgin against
> > libsilc-dev (>= 1.1.9-1) in order to update its binary deps?
> 
> Can you please give a bit more context as it doesn't seem obvious why
> this would be needed?

From silc-toolkit_1.1.9-1/changelog:
|    * libsilc and libsilcclient are now shipped in two different binary packages
|      in order to respect their SONAMEs.  The -dev package depends on both and
|      has been renamed to libsilc-dev.

libpurple0 (from src:pidgin) depends on one of them. I guess a rebuild
would update that dependency; given that silc_client_* symbols come from
the libsilcclient-1.1.3 binary, a dependency against that one is going
to be added.

FWIW, silc-toolkit is uploaded, but not installed, on amd64. Cc'ing
amd64 buildd admins for that matter.

Mraw,
KiBi.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-silc-devel/attachments/20090711/f619e6a7/attachment.pgp>