[pkg-squid-devel] squid-4 experimental package

[Amos Jeffries]

On 28/02/2017 10:22 p.m., Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 28/02/2017 10:50 a.m., Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
>>> Binary packages have already moved to the squid* version, so the matter is
>>> only about the source package.  I don’t see anything blocking the
>>> transition as soon as stretch is out.  This list is ‘pkg-squid’ related
>>> and we can move the repository with ease: just rename the old squid 2.7
>>> repo to squid-old and then move the squid3 to squid.
>>
>> So... if I upload this new one to experimental.... should I go for a squid
>> source?
>>
>> Or should we keep it squid3 for now until we finish with stretch?
>>
>> Regards.
>>
> 
> Well, I am obviously biased, but I think go ahead as-is with the bit for
> experimental. The two sets of changes dont need to be tied together.
> 


Code in experimental branch is now updated for the new upstream release
with somewhat-working GnuTLS (yay!), and pulled in the RC bug fixes from
master. I leave the source package name to uploader.

Now that the 3.5 for stretch has migrated to Testing I think its time
for this one.

Cheers and Happy Easter for those who get a holiday :-)
Amos