[pkg-squid-devel] changes needed for squid on Debian.

Amos Jeffries squid3 at treenet.co.nz
Wed Oct 4 02:05:52 UTC 2017


On 04/10/17 11:55, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
>>> So... I'd say you should do the renaming on experimental and then mix that
>>> with master, or am I missing something?
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>>
>>
>> Would it have to go through the NEW queue with the rename since the squid
>> source package was dropped a while back? that would seem to be the biggest
>> potential hiccup.
> 
> Yes, that's why we should go on, we can upload current version to experimental
> and pass NEW queue there and then when we are ready for unstable we have
> already passed NEW and it will be fast.
> 
> I've modified the experimental tree changing the source package name, I'm
> building right now and if I have the time I'll try to do a build and upload
> to experimental tomorrow if you don't want to change anything prior to that
> and you agree to continue like I have explained.
> 
> What do you say?
> 

Sounds like a good plan to me. I've not got any other changes that I'm 
aware of.

Amos



More information about the pkg-squid-devel mailing list