neon vs subversion

[Peter Samuelson]

[Laszlo Boszormenyi]
> Do you know about possibly 0.26.x support somewhen?

I heard one upstream developer mention it a couple weeks ago - "hey,
look, 0.26 is out" - but nothing since then.  I could look at porting
it myself, but so far I've been too busy with other things.

> I think it may not happen for the 1.3.y tree, but if you have good
> connection with upstream, please ask.

Sure, I'll do so.  I don't mind backporting neon 0.26 support to 1.3.x
if necessary.  I did exactly that with 0.25 to 1.2.x, a few months ago,
but I didn't commit my patch, since upstream released 1.3.0 well before
we needed to use neon 0.25.

> I plan to package 0.26.x as soon as 0.26.1 comes out, but only for
> experimental as 0.26 is ABI incompatible again. :-|

Thanks for the heads-up.  I'll find out what subversion upstream is
doing.

Peter
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-subversion-maintainers/attachments/20060404/66d11350/attachment.pgp