neon 0.26

[Max Bowsher]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Peter Samuelson wrote:
> Since I'm sure we won't ever have serf-by-default in 1.3.x....  (:
> 
> Is anyone working on support for subversion + neon 0.26?  I haven't
> seen any mention of it except when Max mentioned it once on IRC almost
> a month ago.  I'm asking on behalf of the Debian neon maintainer, who
> wants to move to neon 0.26 some time but doesn't want to inconvenience
> us (Debian Subversion maintainers).
> 
> I may find some time soon to look at subversion + neon 0.26, if nobody
> else is already looking at it.  I also don't think it's necessarily
> important to have this support in the 1.3.x branch - I'm happy to
> backport from trunk.

I don't believe anyone is currently working on it. However, we would
definitely want to have it supported for 1.4, I think.

This isn't something we would backport to 1.3.x, and I don't see why you
should have to - surely it wouldn't be hard for the Debian neon
maintainer to provide libneon24-dev, libneon25-dev and libneon26-dev
packages simultaneously? (All conflicting with each other, obviously.)


Max.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (Cygwin)

iD8DBQFEM3pPfFNSmcDyxYARAijmAKCcEduBYobXfNXF0/wz50jqxXOKkQCbB1qR
SkCTilOUszflTFYy0dj66bk=
=uZRg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----