Bug#373387: python transition
Pierre Habouzit
pierre.habouzit at m4x.org
Thu Jun 15 08:41:01 UTC 2006
Le jeu 15 juin 2006 00:00, Peter Samuelson a écrit :
> unblock 373387 by 373628
> thanks
>
> (This block was a false positive. While we use cdbs a little, we
> don't actually use it for anything python-related.)
>
> First, it's not clear to me what advantages anyone would get from
> "fixing" the subversion packaging to comply with current python
> policy. I do not see what is broken about our current package. It
> doesn't hard-code python 2.3 anywhere, so it's binNMUable. (Well,
> other than the "Provides: python2.3-subversion", which can probably
> go away now. It's left over from renaming the package from that.)
>
> It's even less clear what point there is in supporting multiple
> simultaneous python versions, except to avoid the need for a binNMU
> once every 3 years. python-subversion has very few users. Building
> the module code twice, and making the package hard to backport to
> stable, is enough of a pain to make it reasonable to ask what benefit
> these users will get in return.
please follow-up on debian-python@
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O madcoder at debian.org
OOO http://www.madism.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-subversion-maintainers/attachments/20060615/2537dc78/attachment.pgp
More information about the pkg-subversion-maintainers
mailing list