[pkg-synfig-devel] Re: Bug#354069: etl-dev package misnamed for a library

[Fabian Fagerholm]

Hubert Figuiere wrote:
> etl-dev does not follow the policy. It should be name libetl-dev
> because it is a library, even though it is only .h

I was preparing a fix for this bug when I started to have doubts about
it.

Based on my reading of section 8.4 (Development files), the package name
should be simply <libraryname>-dev. Not lib<libraryname>-dev. The name
of this library is etl. Thus, the package name for development files
should be etl-dev.

Please, could you tell us specifically where in the policy you have seen
the requirement to name the package libetl-dev?

Thank you!

-- 
Fabian Fagerholm <fabbe at paniq.net>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-synfig-devel/attachments/20060317/0a36a6df/attachment.pgp