[Pkg-sysvinit-commits] r584 - sysvinit/trunk/debian

[Thomas Hood]

Author: jdthood-guest
Date: 2006-01-11 12:38:50 +0000 (Wed, 11 Jan 2006)
New Revision: 584

Modified:
   sysvinit/trunk/debian/NOTES
Log:
Update NOTES

Modified: sysvinit/trunk/debian/NOTES
===================================================================
--- sysvinit/trunk/debian/NOTES	2006-01-11 12:29:50 UTC (rev 583)
+++ sysvinit/trunk/debian/NOTES	2006-01-11 12:38:50 UTC (rev 584)
@@ -23,8 +23,14 @@
 Ubuntu diff
 -----------
 In 2.86.ds1-6ubuntu1 Ubuntu split a new initscript, mtab, out of mountvirtfs.
-We could do the same, but I don't see the need yet.  (Thomas)
+We could do the same.  Currently we execute mountvirtfs and mountdevsubfs
+again at S36 and S37 so that they can update mtab.
 
+patches for upstream
+--------------------
+debian/patches/fix-minor-warnings should be applied upstream.
+So should a lot of the other patches.
+
 startpar
 -------
 Patches to this should be sent upstream
@@ -35,11 +41,6 @@
 /usr/lib/libldap.so when ldap authentication is enabled; umount /usr/
 would fail.  (Bug #159771)
 
-patches
--------
-debian/patches/fix-minor-warnings should be applied upstream.
-So should a lot of the other patches.
-
 fsck log
 --------
 debian/fscklog.sh is a proposed script for rotating the fsck log.
@@ -91,8 +92,10 @@
 
 regenerating /etc/default/rcS
 -----------------------------
-In svn r541 I removed unreleased code from initscripts postinst that
-didn't fully preserve admin changes.  I wonder if we should strip all
-comments out of existing /etc/default/rcS files and include only a
-reference to rcS(5).
+The current /etc/default/rcS template just refers the admin to rcS(5).
+This way we have only one set of docs to maintain, and we don't have
+to worry about out-of-date comments in /etc/default/rcS.
 
+I wonder if we should strip comments out of existing /etc/default/rcS
+files, leaving behind only the reference to rcS(5).
+