[Pkg-texlive-maint] Re: texlive-basic_2005-1_i386.changes REJECTED

[Joerg Jaspert]

On 10488 March 1977, Frank Küster wrote:

>>>>allrunes       dfsg
>>>>Please: Tell me its not true that the DFSG is used as a license there.
>>> As stated in the License file, this list was generated from the TeX
>>> Catalogue, which *can be wrong*! If you check the actual allrunes files,
>>> you see that it is LPPL.
>> I really hope you've done this --- for all files --- before uploading.
>> Also, there are several versions of the LPPL, at least one of which
>> might have DFSG issues.
> Note that teTeX is worse in this respect (#218105), and that having two
> (groups of) maintainers work on this will speed up resolving that bug,
> while rejecting texlive because it's copyright file is still not ideal
> will not.

Just because something else is worse than this isnt a reason to allow
another bad thing. That argumentation doesnt work.

-- 
bye Joerg
Mal verlierst Du und mal gewinnen die anderen: Immer im Wechsel!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-texlive-maint/attachments/20051129/586b6fcb/attachment.pgp