[Pkg-uml-devel] [VERY LONG - uml planning for etch] how to plan the future

[Stefano Melchior]

On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 06:20:19PM +0100, Stefano Melchior wrote:
Hi all,
> > > > (1) user-mode-linux
[...]
> With my first mail I tried to summarize the state of the art, plus to
> start planning what action to do in the next months.
> I agree with both you when you say that it is better to have only one good
> and working UML kernel than various and (not always with a good support).
> The problem in debian is that you don't always know what is the final
> kernel version: 2.6.14 or 2.6.15?
> My idea is to go for the 2.6.15. Join the kernel team efford and
> cohoperate with both debian and u-m-l.sf.net ML team.
> 
> In this case, are we leaving the 2.4 serie branch support?
> If so, the support should be only for woody and its kernle version.
> If not which kernle to support? 2.4.27 for sarge? But Sarge inclueds no
> kernel-dependent u-m-l pkg, since u-m-l is not included, as well as kernel-patch-uml and kernle-patch-skas (if I am not wrong about the latest).

this weekend I worked on uml x86 and ppc.
I finally obtain a better 2.6.12-1um pkg, without lintian output error and
a 2.6.14-1um. I need to upload the differences for 2.6.12 and the new
branch 2.6.14.

Cheers
SteX
-- 
Stefans Melchior, GPG key = D52DF829 - <stefano.melchior at openlabs.it>
http://etinarcadiaego.dyndns.org    --     http://www.stex.name
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-uml-devel/attachments/20060116/7c862ad8/attachment.pgp