[Pkg-varnish-devel] Varnish backport
Jan Wagner
waja at cyconet.org
Wed May 2 06:08:40 UTC 2012
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Thomas,
On 04/30/2012 06:20 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 04/30/2012 08:12 PM, Jan Wagner wrote:
>> do you think it's possible to provide a varnish backport on
>> squeeze-backports. As we are ~2 month til freeze for wheezy,
>> there shouldn't hopefully so much work on maintaining it there.
>
> Well, there's at least a FTBFS to fix (see #663667) which has been
> opened for a month and a half now. My understanding (when reading
> the bug report) is that it's a unit test that fails. So yeah,
> there's some work on maintaining to be done!
but this work has to be done even for testing and was fixed yesterday
in unstable.
I was talking about the work maintaining varnish in squeeze-backports.
Maybe one of the varnish maintainers will have time to maintain the
package there?
Many thanks, Jan.
- --
Never write mail to <waja at spamfalle.info>, you have been warned!
- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GIT d-- s+: a C+++ UL++++ P+ L+++ E--- W+++ N+++ o++ K++ w--- O M V-
PS PE Y++
PGP++ t-- 5 X R tv- b+ DI D+ G++ e++ h---- r+++ y++++
- ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFPoM9k9u6Dud+QFyQRAo4HAJ95RnNMeNA8qFt4cRJt6QKQfpbo2ACgoZcP
NzhqZDCN6TMjZUCnImbMzRg=
=86IB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Pkg-varnish-devel
mailing list