pierre.habouzit at m4x.org
Wed Dec 21 00:00:53 UTC 2005
Le Mar 20 Décembre 2005 20:48, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 08:45:42PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > I personnaly don't like dpatch, because I just cant get it to work
> > easily. once I have some @@@DPATCH@@@ magic (or whatever it needs)
> > missing, or I forgot to update the cranky 00_patch.list or
> > whatever.
> > I'm more a cdbs simple-patchsys user.
> I don't know it, thus I've some questions to know it better:
> 1) Can simple-patchsys be used without cdbs? I'm a happy (rather
> newbie) cdbs user in other packages, but I don't think it would be
> suitable for the vim packaing ... (or not? what's your opinion?)
I'm not sure it would be a good idea in the current state. at least, not
if it's not a warm consensus.
I suppose that we can quite easily use cdbs-simplepatchsys with just
including the .mk file that create that, I'm not fully sure I must say.
When I use cdbs, ``it just works'' and I've never search any further.
> 2) Is there a way in simple-patchsys to edit a patch? What's
> wonderful with dpatch is indeed dpatch-edit-patch that let you edit a
> patch. You run it and you will get a fresh dir in which you can
> change whatever you want and your changes will be integrated with the
> patch you're editing upon shell closure.
cdbs-edit-patch ? ;)
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O madcoder at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-vim-maintainers/attachments/20051221/efe535f5/attachment.pgp
More information about the pkg-vim-maintainers