Bug#222138: [RFC] new vim-tiny

[Stefano Zacchiroli]

On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 12:35:19PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > 3) (Joey: ) are you responsible for the inclusion of packages in the
> >    base system? If yes (as I imagine), does vim-tiny + vim-common
> >    qualify for inclusion in the base system replacing nvi? The size is
> >    doubled (1100 Kb vs 632 kb of nvi), dependencies are the same,
> >    features are ... infinitely superior!
> Hmm, I think this would be a very good thing. We'd have to discuss it on
> debian-devel though.

Ok, so changes to the base system are usually discussed there, fine.

How do you suggest to proceed? Packaging still need some work (better
descriptions, news, and so on) and I need to coordinate some issues with
the other pkg-vim-maintainers. Do you like me to ping you again when the
packaging is in its final shape - perhaps after the upload to unstable -
so that you can start the thread on d-d (after all you're the submitter
and a member of the d-i team) or what?

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity
of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!-
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-vim-maintainers/attachments/20051101/ff9a7bc2/attachment.pgp