[vim-tiny] completed (?)

Stefano Zacchiroli zack at debian.org
Sun Nov 6 16:39:29 UTC 2005


On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 01:44:14PM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > What about vim-runtime?
> Maybe we should put stuff into vim-runtime, because vim-tiny coulnd't
> symlink to vim-common... vim-runtime is needed for _every_ other vim
> package.

The other way round (vim-common is needed for _every_ variant,
vim-runtime is not), but ok: I got the picture :)

> > More generally: what about the vim-tiny "philosophy". I mean, Do you
> > agree in merging the changes and then continue working on the
> > details in the main branch?
> Agreed.

Ok, I will merge and then fix the /usr/share/doc symlink.

James: no, I haven't forget to look at your symlink patch, I'm only
lagging behind with some debian duties.

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity
of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!-
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-vim-maintainers/attachments/20051106/0ded2138/attachment.pgp


More information about the pkg-vim-maintainers mailing list