Bug#379839: vim: Bogus color schema

[James Vega]

On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 01:40:59PM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 09:50:24PM +0200, Jens Seidel wrote:
> > Hi, I noticed that the default color schema of vimdiff is wrong, since
> > added lines in one of the files are not visible because foreground and
> > background color are identical.
> 
> Since these stupid color schemes make vimdiff nearly unusable I increase
> the severity of this bug to normal. Please try to fix it for Etch.
> 
> Maybe you can just reuse the old files? Manual setting :colorscheme has
> no positive effect. All styles (not only the default one) are unusable!

This depends on the colorscheme.  The default colorscheme does make
Comment that are part of a DiffAdd hard to read.  Although, in my case
it was because the 'background' option was set to 'light' when I had a
dark background on my terminal.  Setting 'background' to 'dark' fixed
the problem.

James
-- 
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <jamessan at debian.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-vim-maintainers/attachments/20061204/52edfad8/attachment.pgp