vim7.1 snapshot packages

Stefano Zacchiroli zack at
Fri May 11 06:46:25 UTC 2007

On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 03:10:18PM -0400, James Vega wrote:
> > Also, I was thinking of using
> > 1:7.1~7.1b-1 for our version number as opposed to the style we used last
> > time -- 1:7.0+7.1b-1.  Any thoughts on this?  (I've verified that my
> Since it looks like Bram is also releasing patches against the
> snapshots, I'm actually thinking it should be 1:7.1~7.1b-000+1.

According to the intended use of the ~ I guess it should be more
something like 1:7.1~beta-000+1, shouldn't it?

Of course there's the potential risk of not being able to beat "beta" in
the alphabetic order but usually just after a beta you get a release ...


Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
zack@{,,} -%-
(15:56:48)  Zack: e la demo dema ?    /\    All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15)  Bac: no, la demo scema    \/    right keys at the right time
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url :

More information about the pkg-vim-maintainers mailing list