Bug#872942: vim-python: neovim missed
jamessan at debian.org
Fri Aug 25 01:58:12 UTC 2017
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 01:34:47PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> reassign 872942 neovim
Looping in python-neovim folks, since it might be better to have the
Provides there. Without python(3)-neovim installed, there is no python
support. It's probably also worth having those "Recommends: neovim",
since the most common use is in conjunction with a local neovim
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 09:44:23PM +0300, Ulyanich Michael wrote:
> > Probably package neovim should be added to the list of alternative versions of
> > package vim-python.
> > It will allow neovim users install some packages with vim plugins (such as vim-
> > youcompleteme) without installing another versions of vim (right now I have the
> > package vim-nox installed on my system only in order to satisfy dependencies,
> > although I don't use vim-nox).
> > I am not pretty sure that neovim is absolutely compatible with every package
> > that depends on "vim-python", so you should decide whether or not to perform
> > any changes.
That's not entirely true. python-neovim only provides the older python
interface, not the bindeval interface. From a quick perusal of
codesearch.debian.net, nothing packaged appears to be using the bindeval
interface (except powerline, which has a fallback).
Another piece to consider is that there should probably be a
differentiation between the Python2 and Python3 interfaces. I didn't
rename the Provides when Vim was changed to use Python3, since it can
only provide one or the other. However, for the sake of clarity, and
because src:python-neovim builds both bindings, there should probably be
"Provides: vim-python" and "Provides: vim-python3".
GPG Key: 4096R/91BF BF4D 6956 BD5D F7B7 2D23 DFE6 91AE 331B A3DB
More information about the pkg-vim-maintainers