[Pkg-virtualbox-devel] Bug#454348: This won't fix makes a hold necessary and use of older virtualbox-ose-source
Dennis Eckhaus
eckhaus1 at comcast.net
Wed Jan 9 19:33:58 UTC 2008
I don't understand the statement that a user isn't supposed to be
rebuilding the source. I only understand that the way to install the
virtualbox kernel module is to do so with module assistant
Module Assistant will only build with the prior Lenny module (I use
Lenny), and not the current Lenny module that aptitude will upgrade to
if allowed, this because of the renaming of the source package. Module
Assistant will not find the package if it is the new one. But it will
download and install the older one if the m-a a-i process is used.
That'll work, but if one accepts the offered upgrade by aptitude there
is no way to use Virtualbox as then there is no kernel module installed.
The same situation has just occurred with the latest NVidia 169.07 Sid
driver. Since the nvidia-kernel-source package contains a different
naming scheme that module assistant doesn't recognize, it is impossible
to install the latest NVidia driver (well, unless using the downloaded
script from upstream, which is what I did).
It is nice that the new upgraded source packages are being named based
upon the future naming scheme that module assistant will use with the
2.6.23 kernels, but what do we do until we get 2.6.23 in Lenny? At
least module assistant can get the older source for virtualbox, which it
cannot get for NVidia. I just put a hold on the virtualbox-ose-source
package so it won't upgrade. But that means of course, that I do not
get whatever benefits that the newer kernel module would contain.
Are you sure this should be a won't fix?
Dennis Eckhaus
eckhaus1 at comcast.net
More information about the Pkg-virtualbox-devel
mailing list