[Pkg-virtualbox-devel] Handling of linux-modules-*-2.6 during

[Frans Pop]

On Saturday 04 October 2008, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Michael Meskes wrote:
> >> it was stupid to upload 1.6.6 to unstable, however, the the only
> >> sane
> >
> > Which of course is easy to say in hindsight. I do not remember seeing
> > a similar statement before the upload.
>
> how suprising is that when the upload was made by patrick without prior
> discussion/announcement/communication/$whatever on the list.

Says the guy who recently uploaded a new upstream version of dosfstools 
without any prior discussion?

Upload restrictions to unstable during the freeze are not always clear and 
mistakes will happen. You yourself have proven this both during Etch and 
Lenny with uploads of new releases of isolinux and dosfstools.
Scapegoating others for making the same mistake therefore seems rather 
strange coming from you.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-virtualbox-devel/attachments/20081004/e9cefa1b/attachment.pgp