[Pkg-virtualbox-devel] virtualbox 3

[Joseph Rawson]

On Wednesday 08 July 2009 03:46:57 Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 04:29:21PM -0500, Joseph Rawson wrote:
> > I was wondering if y'all were planning on backporting the newest
> > virtualbox to lenny.
>
> Yes.
cool! :)

>
> > I haven't messed with the opengl support yet.  I've been using 2.1.4,
> > from backports.org, but I haven't really tested opengl with that version
> > either, even though it appears to be available.
>
> After talking to Alex we decided to wait at least two weeks before upping
> to bpo. I'm not sure thought whether 3.0.0 is the right candidate. We might
> even wait for 3.0.2.
That's probably a good idea.  It's become obvious to me that there are a few 
important bugs that need to be worked out.  When I went to the forum to post 
my experience, I noticed a lot of posts from people having problems with the 
new version.

I mainly asked the question, since I never saw any of the 2.2 versions make it 
to bpo, and wasn't sure whether it would ever be updated.  Thanks for letting 
me know what y'all plan to do. :)

>
> Michael



-- 
Thanks:
Joseph Rawson
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-virtualbox-devel/attachments/20090708/27fd8377/attachment.pgp>