[Pkg-virtualbox-devel] Bug#794466: Virtualbox might not be suitable for Stretch

[Markus Frosch]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256


On 09.08.2015 12:51, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Not sure about MySQL, but for Iceweasel, is it really like that ?
> 
> From what I've known, there were trademark issues which led to the rebranding.

Sorry for being unclear, I meant the usage of upstream releases directly in Debian (security) updates.

> I'm not sure how they handle vulnerabilities. But their release strategy is: ESR and Regular releases. Every security fix goes into the
> next Regular release, and also the ESR release.
> 
> ESR is supported until the next ESR (31 => 38). So usually the Debian Mozilla team prefers the ESR branch for Debian stable.
> 
> With VBox, they don't have an ESR model.

I guess they don't call it ESR or long term support, but as Gianfranco pointed out, they seem to support a lot of major releases currently.

The main problem is here, do we want to use their upstream releases? In lack of a proper patch source, the Oracle way...

Cheers
Markus Frosch
- -- 
markus at lazyfrosch.de / lazyfrosch at debian.org
http://www.lazyfrosch.de
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVyDkrAAoJEPJhXZqrmHtuBtQH/3kp+00a6xaICX1Z9jiVHDa9
iXBVNiswK9QDc7L8dpvNkbF2gWI4Um3Yy8WdpOj2vlz4Mo+kJ3ShXvJS5ONnnJOY
0pxHxkLtnvbVH7eyQRBu2YFxVRmR5eM+/Q3NvF0kZGOALQH+dqgXqvHV7VjG++tm
QkPO00ocMjGZsCqZY74GC1fJyfA0njQRues9qMiatY2ZoowLn6pRB8w3CFZkVmtr
dDdpCsVQE5swZZG7KfCsripQ3PlJD7n1S7lEr0mYVApcvQ4AUvKqTylO7aESVV/Z
XA6+nq9OezFb2PCBkDStbBPzwavfJzCXZa1nqdQ63mYNPlDlPWVgS6Rcy10tlFc=
=4Ip3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----