Virtuoso packaging build-depending on sesame

[Obey Arthur Liu]

On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Marcus Better <marcus at better.se> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> what is the use case for Sesame in Virtuoso? IIUC Virtuoso was going to
> work as a separate backend for Nepomuk (?), independent of Sesame.

From what I understand, it's a connector between Virtuoso and Sesame. It has nothing to do with Nepomuk.

>
> In other words, does it make sense to put effort into packaging Sesame
> as a Nepomuk backend?

As far as I understand, the current effort is behind packaging Virtuoso as a Nepomuk backend to replace Redland, so indeed, working on Sesame as Nepomuk backend is not important.

Remember that Redland, Sesame and Virtuoso have use cases outside of Nepomuk :) That's what I was thinking about when talking about Virtuoso's optional dependency on Sesame.

Cheers

Arthur
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-virtuoso-maintainers/attachments/20100106/94fc6c66/attachment.pgp>