[pkg-wine-party] Bug#649238: marked as done (do we really want to have a split and forked package?)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 1 Jun 2013 12:17:40 -0400
with message-id <CANTw=MNaYqK+=XhMvU76j=3vvyEPHQzRV_tU8jQ5Q3ZJ4KRZ+w at mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: [pkg-wine-party] Bug#649238: do we really want to have a split and forked package?
has caused the Debian Bug report #649238,
regarding do we really want to have a split and forked package?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
649238: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649238
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: =?utf-8?q?Antoine_Beaupr=C3=A9?= <anarcat at debian.org>
Subject: do we really want to have a split and forked package?
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 03:22:29 -0500
Size: 6543
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-wine-party/attachments/20130601/1b0d8822/attachment.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Michael Gilbert <mgilbert at debian.org>
Subject: Re: [pkg-wine-party] Bug#649238: do we really want to have a split and forked package?
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 12:17:40 -0400
Size: 2644
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-wine-party/attachments/20130601/1b0d8822/attachment-0001.mht>