[pkg-wine-party] Looking for feedback: changing the -unstable in wine-unstable

Michael Gilbert mgilbert at debian.org
Mon Apr 14 01:00:48 UTC 2014

Hey everyone,

I think the name of the package needs to change prior to ending up in

I'm currently favoring -next, but -development is also a strong
contender since that is what upstream calls it (but it's rather long
to type).

I've also thought about version numbers (like plain old 1.7), but that
means a trip to new for every new major version.  That doesn't happen
to often, but it's sufficiently annoying that I would prefer to avoid

I've also thought about swapping the naming of two wine packages to
end up with wine-stable and wine, but that might be too disruptive.

So, any opinions, or any other ideas?

Best wishes,

More information about the pkg-wine-party mailing list