[pkg-wine-party] Looking for feedback: changing the -unstable in wine-unstable

[Michael Gilbert]

On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Austin English wrote:
>> Anyway, it's still not clear to me which is right.  More opinions from
>> debian users would help.  Should the plain wine package be stable wine
>> or development wine?
>
> IMO, wine should be the latest stable, wine-development for development
> versions.

Hi Austin,

Thanks a lot for your feedback.  That solidifies the idea, so I'll
plan to change wine-unstable to wine-development and keep plain wine
on the stable series.

> Also getting rid of the various libwine packages (which I believe
> is already planned?) would be very welcome.

Already complete :)  Those are all transitional packages now.

Best wishes,
Mike