[pkg-wine-party] Looking for feedback: changing the -unstable in wine-unstable
mgilbert at debian.org
Thu Apr 17 02:13:08 UTC 2014
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Austin English wrote:
>> Anyway, it's still not clear to me which is right. More opinions from
>> debian users would help. Should the plain wine package be stable wine
>> or development wine?
> IMO, wine should be the latest stable, wine-development for development
Thanks a lot for your feedback. That solidifies the idea, so I'll
plan to change wine-unstable to wine-development and keep plain wine
on the stable series.
> Also getting rid of the various libwine packages (which I believe
> is already planned?) would be very welcome.
Already complete :) Those are all transitional packages now.
More information about the pkg-wine-party