[pkg-wine-party] Bug#737334: marked as done (wine64 recommends wine32 but package wine32 has no installation candidate)

Debian Bug Tracking System owner at bugs.debian.org
Sun Feb 2 01:18:19 UTC 2014


Your message dated Sat, 1 Feb 2014 20:16:59 -0500
with message-id <CANTw=MNp7zA_2Jq0NTJqWre5WhAVp3hSKWbOmTEKDT1B5R-kFw at mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: [pkg-wine-party] Bug#737334: wine64 recommends wine32 but package wine32 has no installation candidate
has caused the Debian Bug report #737334,
regarding wine64 recommends wine32 but package wine32 has no installation candidate
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
737334: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=737334
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Alex Wilk <wo12 at womentie.de>
Subject: wine64 recommends wine32 but package wine32 has no installation candidate
Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 20:54:39 +0100
Size: 3162
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-wine-party/attachments/20140202/b328f70b/attachment.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Michael Gilbert <mgilbert at debian.org>
Subject: Re: [pkg-wine-party] Bug#737334: wine64 recommends wine32 but package wine32 has no installation candidate
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 20:16:59 -0500
Size: 2792
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-wine-party/attachments/20140202/b328f70b/attachment-0001.mht>


More information about the pkg-wine-party mailing list