[pkg-x2go-devel] Bug#784565: Bug#784565: nx-libs-lite: parts are derived from non-free code
Francesco Poli
invernomuto at paranoici.org
Mon May 11 19:36:59 UTC 2015
On Mon, 11 May 2015 09:26:36 +0000 Mike Gabriel wrote:
[...]
> As it seems, dxpc has been long ago relicensed to BSD-2-clause (for
> v3.8.1 in/around 2002).
This is great news, indeed!
>
> I have no exact clue, if NoMachine forked prior to that (if they quote
> the old licensing terms, then probably they did).
Yep, it's plausible...
>
> However, how do you see the situation considering that upstream
> changed to BSD-2-clause a long time ago. What approach do you propose
> for nx-libs-lite to get the issue fully fixed?
If the fork has been performed before the DXPC re-licensing (as it's
likely), I see two possible strategies:
(A) someone gets in touch with DXPC copyright owners and asks them
whether the re-licensing may be considered retroactive (applicable to
older versions of DXPC); in case the answer is negative, DXPC copyright
owners should be persuaded to make the re-licensing retroactive
(B) nx-libs-lite upstream developers re-fork from scratch, basing the
new code on a BSD-licensed version of DXPC (I suspect this may turn out
to be somewhat painful...)
Obviously, the optimal solution is (A). I hope it may work...
Thanks for your time and for your prompt and kind replies.
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-x2go-devel/attachments/20150511/c3fc8ebc/attachment.sig>
More information about the Pkg-x2go-devel
mailing list