[Pkg-xfce-devel] xfce4 in ubuntu

[Rudy Godoy]

El día 08/08/2005 a 14:00 Jani Monoses escribio ...

> Hi Emanuele
> 
> > Do the changelog explain why the epoch was introduced? I am a bit
> > reluctant about using them if not *strictly* necessary...
> 
> It says
> ___
>  xffm (1:4.1.99.3.xfld-2) unstable; urgency=low
> 
>   * Raise version to keep APT happy.
> ____
> 
> Well for debian it is not necessary at all, but since ubuntu has the
> epoch it means it will forever be 'newer' than debian's version. I
> agree it's ugly and I wish there was a more elegant solution.
> 

Actually the Debian' xffm is a virtual package and the real one is
xffm4, so probably you can workaround it by making xffm4 provide it
and conflicting not depending on it anymore, so it gets "killed".

regards,
Rudy

-- 
Rudy Godoy | 0x3433BD21 | http://stone-head.org               ,''`.
http://www.apesol.org  -  http://www.debian.org              : :' :
GPG FP: 0D12 8537 607E 2DF5 4EFB  35A7 550F 1A00 3433 BD21   `. `'
                                                               `-
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xfce-devel/attachments/20050808/faa1460b/attachment-0001.pgp