[Pkg-xfce-devel] README: Proposal for unreleased packages/changelog entries

Jani Monoses jani.monoses at gmail.com
Wed Dec 21 07:29:13 UTC 2005

> Yes, but developer time is more precious thus saving it is good.  Only
> using it for many changes is more efficient.

I wouldn't have proposed what I did unless I had a good motivation
And in this case was that indeed I think more developer time was wasted in
the form of
irc chat, utnubu consulting, bug reports and the afferent threads, etc that
it would have
been the case if some of the current svn was uploaded earlier.

> Maybe some set of rules should be worked out: upload if there's a new
> > revision and at least week has passed or something like that. That
> > would make the buildd be subjected to no more than number of xfce
> > packages per week. Plus other urgent stuff.
> New upstream I agree is sensible but the rest depends.
What if some upstreams are dead effectively(battery-plugin)? We should still
go ahead and upload our

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xfce-devel/attachments/20051221/fb91b69b/attachment.html

More information about the Pkg-xfce-devel mailing list