Bug#344524: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#344524: xfce4-terminal: Depends on libexo-0.3-0 which is not in Debian

Andreas Pakulat apaku at gmx.de
Fri Dec 23 18:46:47 UTC 2005

On 23.12.05 18:07:03, Simon Huggins wrote:
> Salut Andreas!
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 06:55:51PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > On 23.12.05 16:02:53, Simon Huggins wrote:
> > > severity 344524 normal
> > > thanks
> > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 01:44:28PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > > > xfce4-terminal depends on libexo-0.3-0, which is the wrong package name
> > > > for libexo in Debian. The package is named libexo0.3-0 (without the 2nd
> > > > dash). Thus xfce4-terminal is uninstallable.
> > > The new exo package is in NEW.
> > > Once it trickles through NEW it'll all work out.
> > Hmm, that's about the 3rd time I do such a report (i.e. a package
> > depending on another that lies in NEW is uninstallable), so is there a
> > way for a non-DD to check the NEW-queue? I already check incoming.d.o in
> > these cases, but if a package is not there yet I currently don't know
> > where to look at...
> Are you a buildd admin or some such?  I would leave such reports to
> them.

No I'm not. In fact in this case I should have had a 2nd thought, of
course a wrong build-dep would have brought up attention. But often
enough a DD just had a unclean build-environment and then I'd like to
check if that is the case or just some package stuck in the new queue...

> The NEW queue is accessible via: http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html

That is what I was looking for. Thanks.


Stay the curse.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xfce-devel/attachments/20051223/4a1d7e72/attachment.pgp

More information about the Pkg-xfce-devel mailing list