[Pkg-xfce-devel] Re: [Pkg-xfce-commits] r472 -
huggie at earth.li
Mon Feb 13 09:58:42 UTC 2006
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 11:07:19AM +0200, Jani Monoses wrote:
> > Sorry, I meant to reply to this ages ago.
> > I don't think this should be committed. I thought if you were going to
> > make 4.3 changes you were going to do them separately.
> I have specifically put this in trunk as it is good for both 4.2 , 4.4
> and whatever else will come. The comment even says it is done like
> the other libs. So these are not 4.3 specific changes.
I understand, technically, what you have done.
I realise that with this and a different changelog/upstream tarball etc
you can build with the same Debian packaging.
I'm am disputing that this is the right thing to do - surely there will
be other necessary changes for 4.3/4.4 - I don't see what putting this
in now gains us.
> > Also, I'm not happy with these changes. I'd want the package to not
> > build (or at least not usefully ship a library) if the soname
> > changed and noone noticed. I don't think the packaging should ever
> > encompass more than one version of the library as there may be
> > specific things
> It installs all .so.X.Y libraries from the package currently being
> built. If that contains more than one soname version for the same
> library we're in bigger trouble anyway. So with the same debian rule
> we are able to build all upcoming versions of xfce libs. and not just
> the one which has soname 2.0.0 for instance.
If this had been done with regard to a particular upstream tarball we
wanted then I could understand it but these changes appear to have come
Maybe you're just trying to make our life easier - it does sort of make
sense but I really hope we don't miss something through this.
Simon Huggins \ If at first you don't succeed, skydiving isn't for you.
http://www.earth.li/~huggie/ htag.pl 0.0.22
More information about the Pkg-xfce-devel