Tue Apr 21 15:07:30 UTC 2009
current behavior) look reasonable. Does thunar use hal for something
else than acting as a "dependency proxy" to thunar-volman ? Because if
it doesn't, then the recommendation on hal should be moved to thunal-volman.
This address only accepts mails from a restricted set of BTS and ML.
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<blockquote cite="mid:1240810663.8766.0.camel at hidalgo" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I'm leaving the bug open until we decide wether it makes sense or not to
add hal to thunar-volman recommends/dependencies.
<pre wrap="">Looking at the thunar-volman code, I think it should definitely add a dependency
on hal, as it will be basically useless without.
Sure, but isn't thunar-volman useless without thunar anyway (thunar
already recommends the hal daemon)?</pre>
thunar-volman depends on thunar, which depends on libc6, so there's no
way you could install thunar-volman without pulling libc6. Still, libc6
is added as an explicit dependency on thunar-volman because without it,
thunar-volman could never run.<br>
More information about the Pkg-xfce-devel