No subject

Tue Apr 21 15:07:30 UTC 2009

current behavior) look reasonable. Does thunar use hal for something
else than acting as a "dependency proxy" to thunar-volman ? Because if
it doesn't, then the recommendation on hal should be moved to thunal-volman.

-- 
Xr
This address only accepts mails from a restricted set of BTS and ML.

--------------000403040008020000070801
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:1240810663.8766.0.camel at hidalgo" type="cite">
  <blockquote type="cite">
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <pre wrap="">I'm leaving the bug open until we decide wether it makes sense or not to
add hal to thunar-volman recommends/dependencies.
        </pre>
      </blockquote>
    </blockquote>
    <pre wrap="">Looking at the thunar-volman code, I think it should definitely add a dependency
on hal, as it will be basically useless without.
    </pre>
  </blockquote>
  <pre wrap=""><!---->
Sure, but isn't thunar-volman useless without thunar anyway (thunar
already recommends the hal daemon)?</pre>
</blockquote>
thunar-volman depends on thunar, which depends on libc6, so there's no
way you could install thunar-volman without pulling libc6. Still, libc6
is added as an explicit dependency on thunar-volman because without it,
thunar-volman could never run.<br>
<br>