[Pkg-xfce-devel] Suggestions for improving the (Xfce) Desktop install
andreimpopescu at gmail.com
Sun Mar 22 21:35:50 UTC 2009
On Wed,18.Mar.09, 23:04:25, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On mer, 2009-03-18 at 18:59 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac at debian.org> writes:
> > [...]
> > > Good point, but the change need to be made in tasksel, so it's not
> > > irrelevant to discuss that in tasksel lists. But maybe it'd be even
> > > better to discuss that on a bug reported against tasksel? What do you
> > > think Andrei?
A bug seemed a bit annoying for this, especially since I wasn't sure
about the package.
> > I belive the right place to discuss it is in xfce mailing list and after
> > a conclusion has been made, report a bug against tasksel (with a patch
> > if possible) for us to update it.
> > Obviously if we think something is wrong we'll ask and discuss it in the
> > bug report but a lot of noise could be avoided if doing this way. And it
> > will also speedup things for you all.
> Ok, if it's fine with you :)
> Andrei, could you please post a summary to pkg-xfce mailing list, with
> what you think would be nice to have or nice to not have on the xfce
> task? I'll provide my input (maybe in beginning of april because I'm
> going to not be around until end of march) and then we'll provide
> tasksel a patch with the all the data, when 4.6 have ended in unstable
Ok, will repost in pkg-xfce list after I've tested ristretto ;)
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xfce-devel/attachments/20090322/415cf170/attachment.pgp
More information about the Pkg-xfce-devel