[Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#544857: Bug#544857: xfce4-utils: xflock4 can be improved

Yves-Alexis Perez corsac at debian.org
Thu Sep 3 18:23:31 UTC 2009

On jeu, 2009-09-03 at 13:15 +0200, Luca Niccoli wrote:
> As it is now, xflock4 doesn't check for the presence of xlock, which isn't
> guaranteed to be present on the system.

Yeah, it's not really grave to be honest. What if it fails? It's the
last one anyway :)

> I would be nice if it would try to use xtrclock as well.
> Patch attached (against the original version).

I'm not really sure I want to recommend xtrlock usage considering it's
not really intended to hide the screen.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xfce-devel/attachments/20090903/101de34e/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Pkg-xfce-devel mailing list