[Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#658284: Bug#658284: xfce4-session: Please review README.Debian
biebl at debian.org
Wed Feb 1 23:22:32 UTC 2012
On 01.02.2012 23:50, Brian Potkin wrote:
> On Wed 01 Feb 2012 at 22:36:22 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>> On mer., 2012-02-01 at 19:54 +0000, Brian Potkin wrote:
>>>> In brief: /etc/polkit-1/localauthority/50-local.d/ seems to the place to
>>>> inform Policykit about local policy, so one solution would be for the
>>>> user to put .pkla files there. An example might be:
>> I wouldn't recommend doing that.
> I'd be interested in knowing why. Is it using 50-local.d for this
> purpose or something in the structure of the example which is not
The purpose of the plugdev group was previously defined as allowing
users to mount removable media.
By granting access to org.freedesktop.udisks* merely by being member of
that group, those users can now format your system drive. I don't think
you want that.
And there's a lot of other stuff which won't work if your session is not
marked as active, like network-manager, packagekit, upower, etc...
Basically everything which has <allow_active>yes</allow_active> in
It just isn't feasible anymore to workaround that by creating groups for
all those different purposes and adding users manually.
So all in all I don't think it's a good idea to document such a
workaround as a somehow "blessed" method to deal with this.
For now, I'd just recommend to use a supported display manager.
The problem with startx resp. the 90consolekit script is, that it is run
as unprivileged user and CK no longer trusts this context.
That said, I don't think this problem is unfixable. I guess what it
requires is that the PAM stack is setting up the right context so CK can
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 900 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Pkg-xfce-devel